Understanding Our Enemies: Part 3 – Non-Feminist Womyn

24
765

As all good progressives know, a human being is created the very moment a womyn says it is. This could be at any time between conception up to the moment of birth, or possibly beyond it. It is not for men to interfere and quibble with such matters. This is because an unborn cluster of cells is an integral part of the womyns body. Even after birth. Trust us on this. Sadly, not all womyn agree…

Alas, despite the incredible progress we have made over recent years, it seems there are some womyn who refuse to join the sisterhood. These anti-feminists refuse to recognise their intrinsic victimhood and thereby set back the womyns’ movement by many centuries. It is as though they do not realize the struggles that their foresisters endured in gaining the vote, abortion on demand, entering the workforce, fighting patriarchal oppression and celebrating self-actualisation.

Not aesthetically pleasing according to traditional norms but, really, the beauty is in the struggle

Where do we begin in explaining the perverse motivations of the anti-feminist? In the first place, many non-feminists believe they are heterosexual, afraid to question certain realities.

Often, they have an unnatural distrust of public schooling, refusing to accept the implicit wisdom of the common core syllabus. Instead, they “home-school” their offspring, teaching them archaic subjects such as ‘maths’, ‘science’ and ‘grammar’ ignoring altogether more important subjects such as critical race theory, womyns studies and African culture. It is a wonder that their children do not become dangerous outcasts who commit terrible atrocities.

Disgracefully, they bear no natural ill will towards white men, preferring instead to judge each person on their own merits rather than denigrating an entire class of people. In a word, they are traitors to the cause.

Make no mistake, the anti-feminist is just as bad as a white man and also on a par with an Uncle Tom.

Black Lives Matter

LADIES, LISTEN TO PBIER. PUT ON A PUSSYHAT AND PROTEST TRUMP!!!

https://www.pussyhatproject.com/

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-women-idUSKBN14Y0FB

MillionDollarBonus

That movement looks seriously intimidating! I hear that Trump is intending to use bikers, veterans and his fans in law enforcement and the military to bully and intimidate protesters at the inauguration. We need to get as many womyn and minorities to crash his inauguration and who that WE WILL NOT BE SILENCED!

drb6
drb6

I am going to order several of those hip pussyhats and wear them every day!

MillionDollarBonus

Totally agree. Womyn who refuse to stand with feminists are selling out to the patriarchy and challenging the narrative that womyn are oppressed by men. The truth is, womyn don’t need men anymore. Numerous studies indicate that children of single mothers do better than children with fathers. Womyn are perfectly capable of conceiving via sperm banks and living off welfare or sending their kids to daycare while being CEOs and high-fliers. At daycare and school, children are raised and educated by even more womyn about how to be sensitive, and about how smart girls are and how dumb and pathetic boys and men are. This wonderful system has produced more progressives and social justice warriors than ever before, and has the entire nation flinching at any sign of masculinity. Nobody wants assertive, dominant males like Trump leading their countries – we want wise womyn like Hillary and Merkel, and sensitive men like Obama and Justin Trudeau!

Black Lives Matter

Sensitive Men = Sensible Policies

drb6
drb6

Furthermore, advances in pharmaceutical sciences allow parents and accredited educators to medicate boys with Adderall, Prozac, and other medications to discourage their excessive activity and to make boy’s behavior more similar to the acceptable behavior of girls.

MillionDollarBonus

Yes good point. Pharmaceutical drugs are an excellent way to tame boys and keep them under control. We need a docile, feminized population so that there is no opposition to progressivism.

trav777

The studies don’t show that…but again, studies which oppose the narrative are merely long-discredited scientific racism.

We already know from CRT that science is just the imposition of white male oppression onto others. Why should someone be FORCED to believe something simply because it is factual?!?!! People have RIGHTS and one of those is to NOT have to change their opinion because of stupid things like facts, especially when facts get in the way of emotion!

See, what you don’t understand about these studies is how insidious they are- they measure outcomes based upon things like # of sexual partners, teenage sexual activity, and teenage pregnancies. For the PATRIARCHY these were bad things. But for a progressive modern society, this is just slut-shaming wrapped up as science.

See how this works? It’s very very clever of the patriarchy to impose its value system, based upon slavery and white supremacy, and make claims like that maximizing the amount of scholastic achievement is a desirable goal. If we were to take that at face value we would say blacks are useless as a race simply because these “facts” show they underperform everyone else in scholastic aptitude and achievement by a wide margin. This is CLEARLY scientific racism.

So when they make a study, look closely at the outcomes they rank the results in, and you will see the subtle and pernicious hand of white supremacy right there. Things like family formation, drug usage, suicide rates, sexual activity (promiscuity hah)…all outmoded goals of a forgotten, discredited past of oppression of womyn and minorities.

Same can be said about studies showing how blacks had significantly better “quality” of life metrics under segregation. Like that their out of wedlock birth rate was lower, like 25% back then. Who tf claims that THIS is a good thing? To claim it’s good is to insult single womynz. And blacks. Making it racist as hell.

Arch Stanton
Arch Stanton

This new ‘feminist individualism’ is also an ideology which
functions to disguise social domination (sexism, racism, specism, etc).

The shift from a collectivist framework of shared understandings, meanings and
values, to a set of individuals who identify themselves as ‘feminists’ is incompatible with progressive feminism.

It should come as no surprise that the independent, self-motivating ‘individual’ is always male. These ‘libertarian feminists’ who support ‘individualism’ over the collective, are setting human rights back centuries!

There aren’t many ‘feminisms’ but only one, that is, the struggle against white male supremacy.

vdv
vdv

Drumpf, you might have married a beautiful woman, and raised healthy children. But now is the time for progressives, so enslave yourself to the sterile sexuality of a raging feminist (photo 2), and quit being President. We need no man in the White House.

Black Flies Matter
Black Flies Matter

Jesus Jackleg Christ. I’ve been following Accredited Times for years and years, my question is – When will Accredited Times acknowledge Che Guevara? ?????????????

AT just ain’t as progressive as it used to be.

“The revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe. You have to make it fall”. – Che Guevara

ExpatLogger
ExpatLogger

Love yer picture for the article Pbier. Like you say, the beauty is in the struggle. Jees, the womyn can’t even spell Fuckin Feminist write!

wpDiscuz