9/11: Was It REALLY Islamic Terrorism?

32
665


Unless you’ve been living in a cave for the last decade and a half, you’ll have seen them: the alt-right conspiracy-theorists who call themselves “truthers”. These lunatics spend their entire lives, and much of their mother’s electricity budget, uploading nonsense 24×7 from their parent’s basements, wearing out their keyboards trying to convince the rest of us that the 911 tragedy was not the result of 19 men from Saudi Arabia accidentally flying airliners into the Twin Towers, but a deliberate act of terror, sponsored – somehow – by our very own Federal government!

Admittedly, we can see why the official narrative might be difficult for a paranoiac to swallow. For a start, none of the 19 men were accredited pilots, but all of them were observant Muslims. Given that Sharia explicitly forbids careless driving, why would any of them be flying an airliner over New York City in the first place? That assertion alone could immediately raise suspicions. Then there is the issue of the hijacker’s passport found later at the scene: why was there only one? How can it be that only one of these sturdy little paper booklets managed to survive? Additionally, two aircraft flew into buildings that day, one each; how is that only three skyscrapers collapsed perfectly into their own footprints, rather than four or five?

But despite government involvement being disproved by a government-appointed panel, and an exhaustive report detailing how all the government-recognised evidence confirmed the official government narrative, right-wing madmen continue to insist that there were those in the government who were somehow complicit.

Until now, the accredited media have rightly refused to give the oxygen of publicity to these ravings. However, recent findings by top researchers in the social sciences have come up with startling new evidence about that fateful day; evidence that all open-minded persons (i.e progressives) have to consider. And – as you might expect – it has nothing to do with our government.

It is well known that the greatest threat confronting the modern world is catastrophic climate change. And, like every other problem we face today, at its heart lies White males exerting their privilege, in this case by burning fossil fuels.

There are instances, of course, when some fossil fuel use by White males is perfectly justified; driving to campus, heating the departmental jacuzzi, charging up an Apple product, that kind of thing. But most of the time, the energy that White men misappropriate is just wasted on the manufacture of goods and services that are either unnecessary, or too expensive for the disadvantaged to purchase. Yet it has been proven that this is the very group that will have to shoulder the costs of climate change (how many wealthy polar bears do you know?)

Poor people’s patience is legend, as anyone who has witnessed their peaceful demonstrations in places like Ferguson can attest. But it is not infinite, and it appears the long-disenfranchised have started to take direct action to save the planet themselves. Researchers have recently determined that “carjacking”, an obscure phenomenon previously dismissed as a property “crime” by White male lawmakers, is actually nothing of the sort. It is a desperate attempt, by the poor, to help the environment the only way they can: by confiscating planet-wrecking vehicles from their privileged owners so they can destroy them. And what was the missing piece of evidence that enabled researchers to hone in on the truth? One single word: “joyriding”. This term was coined by the carjackers themselves to describe the intense feelings of euphoria they experience once they’ve confiscated a CO2-spewing car and put it out of harms way, via the only method available to them: driving into a lamp-post or other utility pole, a retail shopfront, or, indeed, another car (colloquially known as a “toofer”).

But a single car, though tremendously polluting, emits far less deadly CO2 than a jet airliner. This raises the obvious question: if minorities are selflessly wrecking cars to save the planet, could it be the 911 “hijackers'” motivations were not petty political considerations, such as millions of Muslims being murdered by American foreign policy, but a much more lofty concern: Gaia’s wellbeing?

Consider: in addition to the aircraft themselves spewing vast quantities of planet-killing CO2, the Twin Towers were built to the laughable energy-efficiency “regulations” of the Republican Nixon administration. Even alt-Right bigots admit that the destruction of the aircraft and the skyscrapers reduced their ability to emit CO2, and that the Towers’ replacements will be far more energy efficient.

We know from climate scientists’ models that any reduction of CO2 will save lives. Just how many lives will have been saved by the “hijacker’s” actions? That’s impossible to determine without considerably more research funding, but my colleagues are certain the number of people who will eventually owe their lives to the events of 911 is far, far greater than those who accidentally lost their lives on that fateful day.

Furthermore, the Twin Towers were riddled with asbestos. The costs of stripping it out were estimated to be twice the buildings’ worth, meaning workers were exposed to this hazardous material, day after day. It’s well known that there are no poisons, only poisonous doses; by swiftly collapsing the Towers and dispersing their asbestos harmlessly across Manhattan, the “hijackers” were not only destroying CO2-spewing airliners, but eliminating any risk that the Towers’ workers would eventually fall prey to mesothelioma, a horrible disease that can kill within decades.

Isn’t it time we stopped thinking of the “Saudi 19” as “hijackers”, and start calling them what they really were: martyrs, risking their lives for all of Gaia? Not “terrorists”… but “eco-warriors”: Crusaders for Climate and Social Justice?

 

this is why the accredited authorities are so unconcerned about the Fukushima reactor mishaps: the trillions of Becquerels of radiation generated ceaselessly for the next few centuries will just be diluted harmlessly by the Pacific Ocean.

hungrypirana
hungrypirana

I’ve got a one way ticket for this Accredited Goatfucker. Visit Mogadishu. Experience the beauty of fighting climate change Somali-style.

#islamophobic

hungrypirana
hungrypirana

Accredited Goatfucker
https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1fa_1378174653

#speciesist

drb6
drb6

I don’t agree with all claims made in the article, although I am genuinely thankful to Accredited Thinker about this article which raises many interesting questions. Clearly, it CAN NOT be Muslims who perpetrated this crime, as Islam is the Religion of Peace. Consequently, all the claims that it was citizens of Saudi Arabia who planned and carried out these atrocities should be relegated to the garbage heap of conspiracy theories.

Having said that, please remember who was President at that time, and by extension who controlled CIA and FBI. It was Bush – which means that FBI and CIA were lead by WHITE FUCKING MALES. Do you really think that atrocities of this scale will not be perpetrated by white males, if they were the ones who carried out the Holocaust and are the driving force behind bathroom access discrimination for transgendered Americans?

My impartial analysis leads me to conclude that it was white-male led US Government who carried out these attacks.

MillionDollarBonus

That’s an interesting perspective drb6. And from an identity politics standpoint it makes sense. But doesn’t this give credence to right wing extremist conspiracy theorists who question the official accredited story?

drb6
drb6

An interesting point which needs to be addressed in further studies. I concur that some conservatives claim that US government orchestrated the attacks. My only explanation for that is – conservatives are apparently too stupid to see that US government is mostly WHITE FUCKING MALES who did this to orchestrate attack on Iraq (to steal Islamic oil), and to pass minority-discriminating Patriot Act, which became a force for good only after Obama was elected as President.

MillionDollarBonus

Regardless, I absolutely agree that Bush was a war criminal and a racist. The Republicans start unjust wars for the benefit of oil companies, while Democrats carry out humanitarian interventions in response to humanitarian crises like we saw in Libya and are currently witnessing in Syria.

trav777

It absolutely DOES NOT anymore than “evidence” of massive intra-African slave trading continuing to THIS DAY exonerates fucking white males from INVENTING and being the SOLE participants in the slave trade where they sent raiding parties of 2 or 3 people deep into Africa to capture hundreds of blacks and march them all in chains into boats at the point of a single musket!

Drb6 is merely doing what SHOULD be done in CRT, identify a serious harm or historical crime and FIND A WAY to point the finger at white males for it!

Pbier

Although I’ve not heard this theory before, it clearly passes the test of Occam’s razor as the simplest explanation of all. Therefore, it must be accepted!

In the event that an objection is raised concerning alleged thermite causing an alleged controlled demolition of all 3 buildings, this can again be explained by the caring Muslims’ desire to rid Mother Earth of these environmentally-unfriendly buildings.

drb6
drb6

True, but how could the caring Muslims have placed the termite in the buildings, if not directed and/or supported by Bush administration, e.i. white males?

trav777

absolutely NOTHING about the collapse of WTC1 or 2 was in any way “controlled” or resembling a controlled demolition. Zero.

Engineers for Ending AE911
Engineers for Ending AE911

It didn’t even happen at all, IT WAS FAKE NEWS, Duh?! Everone I know on Twitter and Yahoo know it was a cover story for the White Deplorable Gun Crowd.

http://www.hillarybeattrump.org/home/2017/3/9/wayne-lapierre-hospitalized-after-self-inflicted-paintball-wound?rq=911

LaPierre clasped at his jaw and struggled to catch his breath while an employee at the site calmly called “911.” SEE WHAT I MEAN???

FACEBOOK long ago discredited the 911 Tower story. Those towers only existed in hollywood movies, duh?!

Upon arriving, emergency personnel struggled to subdue LaPierre, who reportedly thrashed about while yelling, “Stop them! They’re trying to take my gun!”

Make my votes count
Make my votes count

I have to concur with the Author. Those Brave 19 “eco-warriors” who gave their lives to save our climate should be celebrated here in america as they are overseas. They actually successfully took out 4 aircraft that day. A section of the Pentagon was able to get up grades as well.

Let’s also mention the hero in Britain yesterday as well. He successfully took out a CO2 spewing SUV and was able to stop at least one cop from being able to shoot anymore POC before another racist officer needlessly shot him. We need to dia-arm police ASAP. They keep killing people.

MillionDollarBonus

Agreed – everyone is laying into the poor Asian Chinese man who drove the truck, but the white policeman doesn’t get criticized for shooting him? What if this man was racially profiled? We need to investigate this as a potential case of police brutality.

drb6
drb6

Actually, Accredited Media has come to conclusion that yesterday’s attacker was a native-born British person, so obviously no connection to Middle East or Islam. As expected, it is home-grown terrorism, probably by a white fucking minority-hating male.

MillionDollarBonus

Well that settles it then – nothing to do with Islam. Even first and second generation Arabs born in Britain are just as British as people of British descent going back over a thousand years. ANYONE can be British! Even if an Aborigine who cannot speak English comes to Britain and is awarded citizenship, he is 100% British for life and can never be deported. This is how multiculturalism works.

MillionDollarBonus

Having said that, white South Africans, who have been in South Africa longer than white Americans have been in the USA, are still not South African, and are nothing but invaders who stole everything from the native people.

drb6
drb6

Interestingly, even Americans of Moroccan and Egyptian origin are classified as White in US census and NOT African Americans, despite their ancestors living in Africa for at least 8000 years and perhaps much longer

trav777

You forgot to mention that this is true EVEN IF there were absolutely no native people there! See, the archeology of North America and the Southern Cape show that these areas were mostly depopulated, even empty in large swaths when the invaders arrived and began brutally slaughtering millions of people to steal their land.

Because occupying LAND is what generates wealth. The brave Mugabe TOOK that wealth-generating land away from the white people and now even the land is racist because it refuses to spew forth houses and farm machinery and crops and electric power grids for the black man. The white man’s voodoo and tricknology strike again!!!

MillionDollarBonus

Wow what a fascinating article Accredited Thinker! Your theory makes a lot of sense. Muslims are known for caring about the environment, and we know that Islam is a religion of peace, so the theory that these men were motivated to do this by their religion just doesn’t make sense. As Pbier and I have discussed, we’re not sure if building 7 really existed or not, as it’s not mentioned in the official accredited 9/11 report. If it was real though, then obviously some of the flames from the nearest of the other two buildings blew over to it, and burned it down. I don’t see anything suspicious or unusual about this. We know from previous examples that burning skyscrapers collapse into their own footprints at near free fall speed with molten steel dripping down the sides and a series of blasts as one floor collapses on top of another. This is documented in example after example of burning buildings.

Pbier

Although the the events themselves were tragic, we should be proud of our leaders who were able to act so quickly in the aftermath. Take the Patriot Act, for example, which is close to 400 pages. It is nothing short of a miracle that this proof-read, legally watertight document could be prepared so quickly. It was also heart warming that our leaders voted ´yes’ to the bill without having the time to actually read it, such was the trust and necessity to act quickly and catch the culprits like Saddam.

MillionDollarBonus

Yes, this is true. Progressives should never let a crisis go to waste. The patriot act allows the US government to wiretap terrorists without a warrant, but it’s still a conspiracy theory that Trump was wiretapped – this is impossible.

drb6
drb6

Or it tells us that Trump is a terrorist, if he was wiretapped without warrant!

trav777

Trump is literally the most dangerous person ever born…he SHOULD be wiretapped! Liberals responsible like Saint Obama should come out and brag about doing it.

trav777

Your insistence that our leaders read legislation is like insisting that people look at the facts before accepting a mass-appeal narrative! You are sounding like a bigot!

trav777

Yes, but burning buildings were not hit with jumbo aircraft in typical cases.

There are other options besides official and “demolished.”

What should concern you more is the substantially more likely case that they were NOT demolished. This means that structural engineering expectations in case of certain fire exigencies get thrown out the window.

WTC1 and 2’s collapses are simply not remarkable or unexpected given the damage to those buildings. 7 and the Murrah building in OKC…wtf.

This is almost like China where little mid-rise buildings fall over on their sides, but everyone can clearly identify the issue there…corruption and lawlessness.

trav777

this is some shark jumping here

the towers didn’t collapse perfectly into their own footprints. Anyone who saw the buildings go down on live TV and who has any knowledge of structural engineering saw an uncontrolled collapse of WTC 1 and 2. For 2, the fkin top 40 floor section did NOT collapse, it just went down and even rotated as it fell. Then it smashed into the ground. Nothing whatsoever resembling a controlled demolition. Additionally, ANYONE with even ONE WEEK of engineering courses learns precisely WHY BUILDINGS DO NOT TIP OVER LIKE TREES.

I don’t know where batshit 911 truthers get their nonsense from.

Focus your energy and attention on WTC7

drb6
drb6

The 9-11 truthers are fucking white males who do not use CRT to arrive at correct conclusions. This is enough to dismiss their ideas. My only minor concern is that by criticizing truther’s ideas I am engaging in sanism or ableism, because their ideas are batshit crazy.

drb6
drb6

termite is not an explosive

drb6
drb6

No it is not. It is used for welding or melting metal, or in incendiary devices, and never as an explosive.

drb6
drb6

And who is to blame for problems in Venezuela –

WHITE FUCKING MALES!

drb6
drb6

There are enough whites there to cause problems and rob the Venezuelans of their riches.

wpDiscuz