Much has been circulating in the alternative media about the supposed “true history” of South Africa, which was liberated from tyrannical white rule two and a half decades ago. Alt right racists and fake news peddlers are arguing that South Africa is somehow on the same trajectory as Zimbabwe (as if this is a bad thing) and that the liberation has led to decreases in living standards for both blacks and whites. They also argue that the true history of whites in South Africa has been obfuscated and rewritten to make whites look like spiteful racists who invaded an established, populous nation and just wanted to oppress black people for their own sadistic pleasure. But from the accredited media and numerous musicians who sang songs like “free Nelson Mandela” in the 80’s, we know that their view of history simply cannot be correct.
Racist right-wingers are now telling fabricated stories about how whites have been in South Africa longer than they have been in America, and that when they originally landed in the Cape, it was sparsely populated with roaming lighter-skinned peoples known as the Khoisan, who are distinct from the Bantu Africans from further north. According to these charlatans, whites lived side by side with these people with minimal conflict, until the Bantu people migrated south and killed most of them. If this was true, then the current majority population of South Africa would in fact be responsible for killing off the native peoples of what was originally South Africa. But this turns the progressive narrative on its head, absolves whites of a crime, and blames a victim group, and therefore by the laws of identity politics, cannot be true.
These racists argue that if the British hadn’t stopped the Zulu expansion in the north east, the Xhosa peoples would likely have been wiped out. But we know that African tribes lived in peace with one another before the white man came with war and disease, just like the Native Americans, so this is obviously false too.
And as if that’s not bad enough, these awful right-wingers are claiming that the resources stolen from Africa and other countries had no utility before Europeans invented the technology to extract, process and utilize them. Excuse me? We know that oil and other natural resources were very useful to native tribes before white people came, and they were extracting and using these materials in all kinds of innovative ways.
Luckily though, through the white man’s tricknology, the high mortality rate of Africans has been massively reduced, and their fertility rate remains high as ever, causing an unprecedented rise in the black population, not just in South Africa, but globally. And because whites aren’t breeding-machines like many other races, and modern democracies have one vote per person, the interests of whites in the world are rapidly becoming insignificant, which according to CRT, can only be a good thing.
We progressives think in terms of narratives, not facts and statistics, and our narrative states that white South Africans are invaders, contributed nothing to the country, and are just mean and nasty people who got (paid) slave labor to build all their wealth for them. This is the narrative, and therefore no amount of reason and evidence can convince us otherwise, because criticizing such a narrative would be racist. And because whites contributed precisely nothing to South Africa, the now freed native population should be able to produce just as much wealth on their own for themselves, as they did for their white masters, who paid them market salaries for low skill labor. So it’s time for the rightful people of South Africa to get these parasitical good-for-nothing whites off their backs and start creating a truly prosperous country. Since whites are selfish parasites who stole everything, the country should do just fine, and in fact better, without them.