Why Smart People Are a Threat to Progress

8
368


Throughout history, progressives seeking to bring about a communist revolution have faced much opposition from so-called “critical thinkers” who question the prevailing narratives designed to undermine capitalism and individualism. In communist China, Cambodia and the Soviet Union, critical thinkers had to be systematically eliminated to make way for progress, or else they would seek to deceive others into believing that they were somehow entitled to human liberty and self-ownership and had no obligation to the greater good. In Pol Pot’s Cambodia, anyone who remotely resembled an overly-intelligent person was killed, in order to mitigate the threat of a counter-revolution.

When an overly smart person confronts a progressive, an awkward situation normally arises in which the progressive is flabbergasted that someone would have the gall to question conventional wisdom, and also intimidated by their ability to think in terms of concepts instead of accepting commonly used words and terms as axiomatic. People thrive on certainty. Too much complexity makes them uncomfortable, and we progressives give them explanations for things that absolve them of responsibility and let them blame everything on white males. But when they encounter smart people, they are forced to explain these narratives from the ground up, which most of them cannot do. This takes away peoples’ comfort and makes them less enthusiastic evangelists for Marxism, leading to a general decline societal progress.

We need smart people, but only accredited smart people – too many smart people is a bad thing, just like too many chefs in the kitchen is a bad thing. We have enough chiefs – we need more Indians who follow orders and lay the groundwork for a better society. This is why progressives favor mass immigration from the third world into the West, as well as foreign aid and welfare. All of these things combined with modern technology are causing an explosion in low IQ birth rates and leading to a global drop in average IQ. This is making it far easier to steer the world towards progress and away from notions of private property and individualism that are popular only with the declining population of white males. Importing many third world immigrants also has the benefit of allowing us to bully the declining population of critical thinkers who oppose us, by forcing them to pay for these immigrants and their children, and setting the immigrants against them with stories about colonialism, racism and slavery.

The truth is, some people are simply too smart for their own good. They question so many things that they can barely operate in the modern world, and they serve no purpose to society other than to shake people out of their comfort zones and make them uncertain about progressivism. Society works most efficiently when people simply accept common sense, which is conveniently provided to us by the accredited media and public education systems, and go about their business seeking hedonistic pleasures, rather than worrying about lofty ideas like morality and the future of our children and the planet. People drive cars every day without knowing how they work, accepting that they are complex machines to be understood by a select few. The same should go for questions of ethics, which should be left to Critical Race Theory professors and accredited supreme court justices. It is not for us to question prevailing progressive narratives, but to simply accept them. Those who seek to undermine the common good by shaking our confidence in these self-evident truths are a menace to society, and need to be eliminated in order to make way for a better future.

trav777

Hear, hear, MDB. Another tour de force article.

Be very careful mentioning IQ however, as it is racist except when used to show that a person of color should not get the death penalty. IQ is something that would “definitely” be the same for everyone and “totally” depends on environment, despite that data and evidence showing that it is predominantly hereditary.

If you question evolution, you are also anti-science, but if you accept or suggest any implications of evolution with respect to sex or race, then you are a bigot. Except for when you are accusing “whites” or “men” of privilege.

This can all be very complicated so it is best to merely repeat accredited thought and phrases. Even if you don’t understand them. Kind of like how non-arab muslims memorize the koran in arabic despite not speaking arabic.

Black Lives Matter

Agreed. We only need one Obama.

Vladmir Putin
Vladmir Putin

Smart phones, smart cities, smart meters – there is an explosion of smartness.

hungrypirana
hungrypirana

Fostering stupidity is the latest iteration of progressives’ desire to enslave their supporters.

Black Lives Matter

So the “Soviet Communist Jews” wanted to kill other Jews? Ludicrous.

Aunty FaLaLa
Aunty FaLaLa

I’m just glad I’m not smart.

wpDiscuz