Why The State Should Arrange All Marriages

19
192
3f30d45d62357c7a71e71dc60567dca5_ls_xl.jpg


For many millennia, the institution of marriage has served society well. It creates stability, has provided children with a solid foundation, and has been the building block of whole communities. In fact, marriage is such an incredible success that most progressive governments have sought or are actively seeking to extend it to all people so that it is no longer the exclusive preserve of heterosexual couples. As David Cameron wisely put it when advocating the widening of marriage to include gay couples:

Marriage is not just a piece of paper. It pulls couples together through the ebb and flow of life. It gives children stability. And it says powerful things about what we should value…I once stood before a Conservative conference and said it shouldn’t matter whether commitment was between a man and a woman, a woman and a woman, or a man and another man. You applauded me for that. Five years on, we’re consulting on legalising gay marriage. And to anyone who has reservations, I say: Yes, it’s about equality, but it’s also about something else: commitment. Conservatives believe in the ties that bind us; that society is stronger when we make vows to each other and support each other. So I don’t support gay marriage despite being a Conservative. I support gay marriage because I’m a Conservative.”

We normally despise everything that conservatives stand for. On this occasion, however, it was strangely impossible to disagree with anything Cameron said about his support for gay marriage. Not only did he want to conserve marriage, he wanted to make it available to anyone. It was almost as though Cameron had turned progressive for the day, or else was conforming to some hidden agenda given to him from on high. However, we reject such conspiracy theories.

Whilst we agree with Cameron’s words and subsequent actions in pushing through marriage reforms, we believe he should have made even more radical changes. The government could do so much more than merely pass legislation and then act as uninterested observer. Let us explain.

In many parts of the world, especially the Indian subcontinent and the Middle East, marriages are arranged between families. Whilst this does not suit the Hollywood ideal of “boy-meets-girl-and-fall-in-love” (pre-1990) or “cowboy-meets-cowboy-and-they-fall-in-love” (post Brokeback Mountain), the undeniable fact is that arranged marriages work. Arranged marriages create tight bonds between families, ensure peace, and serve a plethora of needs. Unlike non-arranged marriages, very few arranged marriages result in divorce. The success of arranged marriages proves that romantic love is not necessary for a couple to thrive together.  Why then are not all marriages arranged?

Bigotry. Racism. Six Billion (maybe).

Although naysayers have predicted the end of arranged marriages for many decades now, the truth is that they are an unparalleled success. Certainly, based on divorce statistics, they are way superior to traditional ‘romantic love’ marriages.

What, then, can the state do to ensure that more couples benefit from the special bond of marriage? Society, after all, is crying out for more stability. Take house prices, for example. Given the population explosion, the fact that more people than ever before are choosing to live alone (postponing marriage or avoiding it altogether), houses are becoming less and less affordable. It makes every sense therefore for couples to come together, combine resources, and share a house.

A radical solution is needed. If an individual chooses not to be married by the age of say 21, for example, we believe the government should intervene and arrange a marriage between said individual and another person the government deems appropriate. Where possible, the state will take into account age, background, interests and maybe even sexual preference when choosing a mate, although this cannot always be guaranteed.  Sometimes, more gay marriages are needed for the betterment of society, even though this may feel like a sacrifice to at least one of the newly wed. Deal with it, we say!

Simply put, the State knows best when arranging a marriage. What might seem, at first, an unsuitable match should prove a wise betrothal in the long run.

Our modest proposal then is that governments around the world create a Ministry of Love.  Let the weddings take place!

trav777

And I say SO WHAT if gay marriages are almost invariably sham arrangements intended to provide tax benefits and for which there is virtually no commitment whatsoever in general? It is CURRENT YEAR, do not stand in the way of LOVE!

MillionDollarBonus

Feminists want men to commit more, and sign away all of their wealth to them. And if they won’t do it, then they need to be FORCED to by the state!

trav777

but only when womyn want to.

Don’t let anyone tell you that young womyn are delusional about their shelf life nor that old womyn are delusional about their freedom of choice because YOUGOGURL means they can do whatever they want whenever.

If Roy Moore pursued a fertile, legal aged girl when he was 30, that is incomprehensibly evil. But when Brigitte Macron did it, it was YOUGOGURL. And she was even his teacher, in a position of authority, as opposed to just a suitor who asked permission to date from a girl’s parents like Moore is reputed to have. I cannot even think of how evil Roy Moore is for not marrying an older womyn who was entitled to his attention, affection, and money.

MillionDollarBonus

A womyn’s attractiveness increases with age like fine wine. Older womyn are smarter, more politically aware, more experienced and have had more relationships with other men, making them far more attractive than younger womyn. It’s just a pity that the patriarchy indoctrinates men to think otherwise.

TedCruz
TedCruz

Another explosive idea. What’s a man to do if paired with a fatty who doesn’t know how to mop, vacuum or cook?

Make my votes count
Make my votes count

In my case you stay with them because it’s way cheaper to keep them.
She could not do those things when she was young and skinny, but it was OK then.
Who knew inactivity would lead to the fatty part?

Mules! Proof of Allahs Kindness
Mules! Proof of Allahs Kindness

I think the LIBTARD goal is to have a man paired with that kind of unlovable slut.

because

Many sluts needs food, a roof over their heads, AC in summer and heat in the winter, and ALL your money as well.

MillionDollarBonus

We need to have forced GAY marriages to balance things out! People need to have sexual orientations assigned to them, along with appropriate partners. We don’t need any more heterosexual marriages. Heterosexuals have had their time – now it’s time for the LGBTQ+ community to shine!

richandrenee

Yes – and the Government needs to force small business’ (bakeries etc.) to provide homosexuals fabulous weddings.

Black Lives Matter

Totally agree as well. With overpopulation and discrimination, all marriages for should be interracial gay marriages, just like in prison.

Some may pretend to protest, but secretly progressive males will be thrilled when a “Tyrone” or “Jamal” is selected for them. Plus, it’s the only way they can show how tolerant they are.

Conservatives also believe in marriage, so it’s obviously the conservative thing to do.

MillionDollarBonus

Agreed. And yes, all accredited Christian conservatives believe in gay marriage now. Even the pope supports it.

MillionDollarBonus

One of the solutions to higher house prices is to have forced marriages of more than two people, to reduce demand! We need arranged marriages of two non-binaries, three cis-females and one trans-male for example. This would free up a couple of houses that might otherwise be occupied by two-person monogamous couples.

trav777

No we need to increase demand by lowering lending standards because they are racist to minorities

Mules! Proof of Allahs Kindness
Mules! Proof of Allahs Kindness

Isn’t money EVIL??

How dare you advocate spreading this EVIL around to lower class non-Jewish trash?

It is well known that Jews can resist the temptation of that EVIL.

Mules! Proof of Allahs Kindness
Mules! Proof of Allahs Kindness

Those kind of people can live in a tent, get in touch with their inner selves and

starve, freeze, be generally unhappy

Polyamorous
Polyamorous

Couples? That is so YESTER YEAR.

It is the CURRENT YEAR! The GovT needs to be arranging group marriages.

MillionDollarBonus

Woodstock baby 2018!!! Let’s PARTYYYY!!!

wpDiscuz