Why We Need a Bachelor Tax

31
207


Many feminists have often asked the question, what are men good for? They can’t clean, they can’t cook, they can’t take care of the kids, and they can’t even commit to a relationship. Womyn have proven that they are just as effective at the jobs men used to do, and that all they need is a little affirmative action, paid maternity leave and a few anti-discrimination laws in order to compete in the workplace. Of course, the playing field is far from level, as womyn still get paid 70 cents on the dollar compared to men, not counting things like hours worked, quality of work produced, type of work, ability to negotiate for higher pay or other unimportant details like that. But still, womyn have proven themselves competent enough to work in a variety of clean office jobs in companies and industries invented and run by men, proving that men are essentially worthless. However, there is one role that womyn still want men to play – and that is the role of husband and provider.

Yes, feminists want careers and they want to close the wage gap, but they also want a man who earns more than them so that they don’t have to have careers and so that the wage gap widens. Womyn want to work in a high flying job in which they can meet and marry wealthy males and then quit later to have kids when they’re much older. Womyns’ sexual market value peaks at about 38 or 40, which is when most feminists intend to get married, ideally to a rich 33 or 35 year old good looking man, who much younger, but frankly immature womyn also want to date. This is the ideal life vision of every womyn – to have a career, earn lots of money, spend most of it, be promiscuous, and then find a rich man when they’re older and used up to maintain the life they’re accustomed to and more. If the womyn decides one day that she’s “unhappy”, or finds a better man, she has the option of taking everything the man has including his children, or maybe getting him arrested or fired with a rape accusation. This is fair, because it benefits womyn, who are fair, honest, selfless, compassionate, empathetic, loving, caring and intelligent.

In the olden days, marriage used to be a vow before God, and was about making a commitment to your spouse to be loyal, loving and true to your word until the day that you die, for the benefit of your children and society. But today, heterosexual marriage is for the benefit of womyn only, at the expense of men, which is far better than the patriarchal Christian form of marriage. The bible is horribly sexist, and commands womyn to submit to their husbands in return for the resources he provides for them, according to these passages recently quoted by drb6:

Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness. I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet. 1 Timothy 2:11-15

To the woman he said, “I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children. Your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.” Genesis 3:16

Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands. Ephesians 5:22-24

But even Christian womyn and progressive pastors choose to ignore these passages, and say that men need to submit to their wives too.

In response to feminism, misandry, rampant female hypergamy, womyn spending their peek child bearing years working, the kangaroo family courts run by feminists and a myriad of laws that allow womyn to destroy men’s lives whenever they feel like it, surprisingly the birth rates in feminist countries have plummeted, and men seem to be averse to getting married. This is clearly men’s fault for not wanting to commit! Some men seem to think that staying single or spending ages looking for a “loyal”, younger womyn is in their self interest, but what about womyn! When since did men’s interests matter? Only womyn’s interests matter! This is why it’s high time we introduced a bachelor tax for single men.

The role of a man in society is to provide for womyn, and to ask for anything in return is just sexist and part of the war on womyn. A real man doesn’t ask for anything in return for his money, life’s work and sacrifice – he simply hands it over to a deserving womyn for existing, and signs into a contract that gives her total and complete power over him. If the womyn decides later that she wants to take the house, the kids and force the man to live out of his car to provide child support for kids he can’t even see, then that’s HER CHOICE. HER BODY, HER CHOICE! It’s well known that womyn receive a huge amount more from the state than they pay in taxes, and bachelors need to start paying up or we’re simply going to take their money away. Men’s money belongs to womyn, and men are there to serve womyn. Womyn aren’t prepared to provide anything to men in return for their sacrifice because that’s sexism, so it’s time for men to pay up, shut up and hold their heads in shame!

Leave a Reply

31 Comments on "Why We Need a Bachelor Tax"

Notify of
avatar
Photo and Image Files
 
 
 
Audio and Video Files
 
 
 
Other File Types
 
 
 
Black Lives Matter

Real men should pay higher taxes voluntarily. Taxes are trendy.

Pbier

The edgiest thing you can do is to try to pay as many different types of taxes in one week:

Income tax
Value added tax
Set up a company and pay corporation tax
Capital gains tax
Inheritance tax (tricky to achieve this without planning, but euthanasia of someone close is a possibility…)
Vehicle excise tax

Anyone who achieves all the above in one week is highly trendy

Black Lives Matter

Giving is better than receiving!

Rosie O\'Vaginosis
Rosie O\'Vaginosis

The bachelor tax is an excellent idea MDB. Men (especially white men) are useless to womyn and therefore should be put to work by the state to support the needs of womyn. The money that is confiscated from them will be efficiently used to support the state which will efficiently distribute the money to the womyn’s collective. Men, if not heavily taxed, would just fritter the money away on things like producing wealth and providing services. I can not think of a better tax and spend program that would benefit those who are most deserving.

Missy Bo Pepys
Missy Bo Pepys

Screw the womyn’s collective! If you tax men too much, who will buy womyn the important things like diamond rings and pearl earrings?

trav777

EBT

Sassy Beau Pepys
Sassy Beau Pepys

How romantic is that?

Sassy Beau Pepys
Sassy Beau Pepys

Diamonds are a girl’s best friend!

Missy Bo Pepys
Missy Bo Pepys

In my experience rich bachelors are always on the lookout for a womyn of class, like a girl with a pearl earring

Missy Bo Pepys
Missy Bo Pepys

Cheap women use faux pearls to give themselves a veneer of class

Sassy Beau Pepys
Sassy Beau Pepys

Rich bachelors beware faux pearls? Is that what ya trying to say? Spit it out, Sis!

Sissy Bo Pepys
Sissy Bo Pepys

Nothing here for you to understand Sassy, you with your white trash wrapping!!

Bill Gated
Bill Gated

Taxes are a man’s best friend, they help him avoid spending money on women.

Sissy Bo Pepys
Sissy Bo Pepys

That’s some accountant you got there, giving you tax advice like that!

Sassy Beau Pepys
Sassy Beau Pepys

Misogynist is the word, Sis!

wpDiscuz